Earnings from Photography in June 2023

I think we start this monthly report on earnings with a short word. Wow!

This turned out to be a remarkable month. I was expecting a good month because of the Adobe offer to “buy” a one year license on certain images to offer them free to buyers, but even excluding the income from that, I set a pretty high bar. Total earnings for June turned out to be $4433! My graph with the Adobe free license includes is as follows:

How much can you earn from selling photography online? This photographer explains his success tricks
Earnings from Photography in the past five years

And this is with a portfolio that includes the following assets at the various stock agencies:

How many images do you need to make money from photography online?
Number of assets at the main stock photo libraries

Adobe Stock Free Image and Video buyout

This is becoming an annual event now – Adobe Stock offers to buy the licensing rights for a 12 month period for images and videos which they then offer at no cost to their buyers. I have submitted most of what they recommend each year (removing ones that I think might sell better for me), and this year, I had 9 videos (for $72) and 212 photos for $1060 accepted into their free collection. Looking at the images, they are not ones that have sold well on Adobe, but it is always a bit of a risk. This year, I decided that anything that could easily be created by AI systems might as well go into the “free collection” and the resultant extra income of $1132 is included in my total above. Without that, I still achieved a very impressive $3301 for June. That compares very favorably with the $2812 for May. In fact, the last time I got this much was in April 2022 when I earned $3457. While most agencies did pretty well that month, the key factor was $716 in Fine Art Sales including $432 from Pictorem.

Agency performance in sales

As we might expect, Adobe Stock was well in the lead with $1979, which includes the $847 for normal sales in the month. That itself is almost a record, although I did earn $857 from Adobe in March of this year. Next in the list is Shutterstock with $540, then almost a tie between iStock and Alamy with around $367 each. Canva was good as well with $260 this month and then we are dropping fast. Pond5 was pretty good at $135, but that did include a license upgrade on a previously sold video that netted $100. I wasn’t able to identify the specific video that was upgraded, and it wasn’t worth much effort to find out which it was. Then we are in the weeds.

What was a very pleasant surprise was that I managed to sell quite a number of prints this month. Fine Art America came in nicely at $373, then a sale on Photo4me in the UK and one locally all helped. Even Society6 came in with one sale of a print that netted $31. Altogether, these print sales came to $535 compared to $232 last month. I’ll talk more about that below.

High priced sales in June 2023

I always like to see how much I earned from “high-priced” sales. It is a bit of a joke that these days, we think of anything over $10 as high-priced. Film photographers everywhere will be turning in their graves at the thought of such low values being assigned to our work! However, June gave me $563 from sales of assets for more than $10. There were 16 sales in total, one of which was that $100 video license from Pond5. The highest earner was with Alamy and was an editorial shot of some fine wines that I had shipped to me. This one sold for a net of $77.

Stock photo of fine wines being delivered by Naked Wines in the USA

So, I manage to earn money from the wine I buy to enjoy in an evening!

Alamy also came up as a winner with two sales of images from Equatorial Guinea that I didn’t upload very widely. This is a difficult country to visit, and photography is not altogether welcome there. This image was taken as the car we were in was going around a roundabout:

Stock photo of a monument in Equatorial Guinea

This and a different image were sold for $53 net each. My famous cat earned a download for $34 on Shutterstock, and this image of an ornate fountain in Nuremburg in Germany earned $37 on SS:

Detail of the Schoner Brunnen fountain and statue in market square of Nuremberg, Germany stock photo

SS also gave me a sale for $36 for this shot of me filling out an absentee ballot form during the Covid lockdown days. Simple stuff to produce:

Senior adult filling in absentee ballot voting form in USA presidential election

Fine Art Sales in June 2023

As I mentioned earlier, I had quite a boost from print sales (what I call my Fine Art Sales) in June, rising to $535 from a run of months in the $200s. I count Fine Art America ($373), TurningArt ($58), Pictorem ($0), Society6 ($32), Photo4Me ($45) and local print sales or licenses ($28) in this total. It does require more work to upload them (although most sites are not bad) and it obviously requires a lot more effort to try to bring attention to them, which generally means Instagram, Twitter and Facebook efforts. As I’ve explained in the past, I find the Facebook groups the most valuable route to sales, especially if you can build some sort of rapport with the group so that you are known there and in people’s mind if they ever think a print might be a good idea. I had three sales of a local waterfall on Fine Art America this month, which I am pretty sure would have occurred because of my involvement in a local “growing up” group on Facebook.

Wall art print of Cascade of waterfall into swimming hole with blurred motion on Deckers Creek running by Route 7 near Masontown in Preston County West Virginia
Cascade of waterfall into swimming hole with blurred motion on Deckers Creek running by Route 7 near Masontown in Preston County West Virginia

I also sold a print of Santa Barbara courthouse in California taken way back in 2012.

Wall art print of Exterior of famous Santa Barbara court house in California
Exterior of famous Santa Barbara court house in California

The original was far less attractive – just goes to show what a new (appropriate) sky can do to an image!

Exterior of famous Santa Barbara court house in California

I did learn from one of the forum discussions on FAA that not all the images that you upload on FAA are actually indexed on Google. In fact, quite a small proportion appears to be. There are some tricks to try to increase this, and I’m investigating more. I’ll report back if I can find anything that works!

Here is my history of these fine art sales:

Earnings from selling prints online
Sales of Fine Art work as prints and other products

I think that rounds out the month. I don’t expect I will report anything like this next month!

(Visited 2,009 times, 4 visits today)

14 Responses

  1. Alessandra says:

    Congratulations on your sales! What are the criteria used to index the images on FAA? First I hear about that.

  2. Michalis says:

    Congratulatios Steven

  3. Nicko prints says:

    Congrats for your good month in sales. Is strange that you managed to have a such a good month on FAA, while a lot of people on the forum there, including me had almost no sales. Also for me month sales are opposite than yours. I had a bad November, December and January, with excellent period between February and the first half of May. Since then, a bad period. And most of my sales are coming from Google search. And my traffic is constant since February.

    • Steven Heap says:

      Yes, it is odd how these things work out! Sometimes the buyer is just ready to buy and they do. I’m not sure you can do much to specifically enable that, apart from keep getting your name out there and make sure people are aware of what sort of images you sell.

      Steve

  4. Rick Boden says:

    Good work! I’m amazed at the number and variety of placements you have. How do you keep track of which image is where? Database or spreadsheet? Or do you simply put every image on every portal?

    • Steven Heap says:

      Thanks Rick! I use Stock Submitter to upload all the images – if an agency is not supported via that App, then I don’t bother with it. I upload all files to all agencies (obviously some don’t take editorial ones and I upload those separately), but I don’t then track what happens. However, Stock Submitter does keep a track of submissions and acceptance for each image and each agency and so I can see whether a particular image has been accepted or not. I don’t tend to bother very much with resubmissions though. I have had quite a lot of rejections for Quality Issues with Adobe recently and so I might resubmit some of those (without changing them of course as I don’t think there is anything wrong with them!)

  5. Rick Boden says:

    Thank you Steven, I appreciate your openness in sharing information. I had not heard of Stock Submitter or any automated submission process and I find it very interesting. I will explore. I had started to send to Adobe but they would not accept my model releases and wouldn’t tell me why so I gave up on them.
    Incidentally I am one of those “Film photographers” you refer to and having had regular >$5K single image sales including one almost $50k in the past, it has been very difficult to accept the new reality. However turning over in my grave 🙂 is not going to pay the bills so I have to look into everything. To be honest, for me it is more about doing something with my images instead of just having them sit on my computer.

    Thanks again! p.s. I didn’t get the new post email so that is why I didn’t respond immediately.

    • Steven Heap says:

      I think the emails only come when I write a new post. Not sure I ever set it up for comments. I can imagine the disruption you must feel. I missed that period altogether and so the new reality was the only reality I knew!

  6. Rick Boden says:

    Thanks, I think disruption by technology is something we need to get used to. When “traditional” stock crumbled, I got into aerial photography. Then a few years later, along came the drone hobbyists wanting to pay for their gear. Do you worry if and how AI is going to disrupt current stock? When I saw your mention of Adobe buying out licences, I wondered if any of that was for AI feeder…not that I know much about it. Anyway, what you are doing and the success you are having is great. Congratulations on that.

    • Steven Heap says:

      I don’t worry that much about AI, yet! I think it is definitely going to hit some of the simple studio shots that I have (but others have many more of) and also the people stock shots must be under tremendous threat, both from buyers doing their own, but also from new contributors creating new imagery that they would never be able to achieve in the past. A lot of my sales tend to be specific places though and I think it will be a long time before someone decides that an AI composition of Morgantown, say, is better than my version. And why would they bother – there are already good pictures of Morgantown! I believe Adobe is someone that will pay reasonably for the use of stock images (all of them) to train AI systems, but they buyout the licence for a year to allow them to offer a range of “free” images to compete with the likes of Freepik. So you can take a “so-so” free image from Adobe or you can pay for something a bit better.

I'm always interested in what you think - please let me know!