Making Money from Travel Photography – Part 3

Parts 1 and 2 of this extended post have discussed what to take on a travel vacation and then how to select and process images on your return. I’ll now turn to keywording and uploading the images.

I finished processing most of the images in mid October and eventually ended up with 389 images that I thought were worth keywording. I generally follow a simple rule about what is going to be “editorial” and hence only uploaded to my own site, Alamy, Corbis and Zoonar and the rest, which go to all sites. Because of tight restrictions on images with people needing a model release on some of those sites, anything with a person in it, however small, goes into the RM/Editorial bin unless I decide to clone out that person. Then, anything with modern property that is recognizable and likely to need a property release goes into RM/Editorial as well. With that rule in place, I ended up with 117 in RM/Editorial. I generally start at the beginning, and copy some standard keywords across the whole set – in this case Spain, Europe, Travel, Destination, Tourism and Stock Photo. I added that last one because my own stock site doesn’t automatically add those words and they probably help with an appropriate Google search. Then I go through each image and try to describe what it is, what it represent, where it is, any proper description of the location, whether there are people present (nobody or “people in background” being the most usual phrases). I try not to put anything too flowery in there – just the words that I would use to find this image. Writing a reasonably long description often helps throw up a few words as well – it is strange how the act of typing the description makes you hone down exactly what an image is about. So this one of the Parador hotel in Toledo would be keyworded as:

Parador de Toledo with swimming pool and dramatic overview of the city of Toledo, Spain, Europe

Parador de Toledo with swimming pool and dramatic overview of the city of Toledo, Spain, Europe

“balcony, building exterior, city, dramatic, editorial, europe, evening, hotel, lodging, overlook, overlooking, parador, Parador de Toledo, people in background, spain, stock photo, swimming pool, toledo, tourism, travel, view”

I also add the GPS coordinates from the Map function in Lightroom and type in the Sublocation field with the city, state, country to provide one more help in finding it.

If I have more than one image of the place, I then “sync” the metadata to the other files, but I always look at each one in turn to strip out erroneous keywords and add something more specific if needed. I obviously miss things and after doing this hour after hour, you can get a bit shell shocked, but that is the plan!

I’ve been working on this on and off for the past two weeks – doing 2 or 3 hours at a time, and so the total time put into keywording those 389 images must be about 40 hours I guess. Nobody said this was easy!

Looking at each image as you keyword gives you another chance to check the exposure and develop settings and I sometimes make tweaks as I go. Finally, if I come across an image that I just can’t get enthusiastic about keywording, I discard it. No point in working on something that you don’t think has much chance of selling. I processed this one, but when I looked at again, I just decided it had such little interest to anyone that it might as well go into the discarded pile:

Not worth keywording

Not worth keywording

With all my images keyworded, I first select and export the RF ones into one folder and the RM ones to another. I generally use 4500px as the longest length and quality of 90, with sRGB as the color space and no sharpening.

I use StockUploader to upload all the files to the agencies – it works great for me – just sit back and let it do its stuff. Then it is a case of going to the agencies in turn and submitting them. I generally start with the bigger sellers – Shutterstock, Fotolia, Dreamstime, and am reasonably careful with the categories, but I don’t waste time getting them exactly right. If there is a “Travel: Europe: Spain” choice, that will work for most of the images.

In the next installment, I’ll write about what happened – what was my success rate in getting them accepted.

If you are interested, I now have all the Spanish travel images online on my own stock agency BackyardStockPhotos.com. They aren’t in any particular order – the RM/editorial ones are on the later pages as I uploaded those first.

(Visited 188 times, 1 visits today)

9 Responses

  1. stuart miles says:

    I’ve been following your blog for a year or so and am experiencing the same as you with earnings going down. I am in the process of starting my own site as you have done and had a big think about how to monetize it.

    In the end I decided to go for giving away images free with adsense on the page and with buttons for people to promote me on social media. The site is BusinessImagesFree.com and I have about 30,000 images.

    I am reading up and watching videos on social media marketing but will make a comprehensive plan using linked in, facebook, youtube etc. before I start and try to automate it as much as possible. I also aim to make a mailing list then send emails about Christmas, Easter and other dates.

    Another thing I intend to allow is people to download my images on other sites with a requirement of giving me a backlink.

    I haven’t done anything yet to promote the site and only had it working in the last 2 weeks but have got around 4 dollars anyway. It isn’t much money but if I comprehensively market the site I think it should do better than selling the images myself.

    I might well do a blog on how it all goes and I’ll will give an update here at some time if you are interested.

    • admin says:

      Hi Stuart
      That is certainly an interesting approach. I notice that a lot of your images are illustrations – I thought that the self hosted sites of vector artists tended to do better than photographers, although I don’t have a lot to back up that statement. Please update me here (or direct via email) on how you get on. My own stock site is not doing great – I like the look of it, but buyers are very few and far between. Not sure if you have your files available on stock sites? I would have thought you were potentially in danger of losing revenue from them if the same image is available for free download?
      Steve

  2. Alessandra says:

    I follow your work with interest, got the book, followed your advices etc and at least for now my images have been accepted. A have read other books as well, but yours is by far the friendliest and most encouraging. For that to making enough sales to reach the threshold and get paid will be another step, but I am having fun doing this and, if nothing else, improving my photography. Thanks for all the good advice you have given. Now, I have a question, why do send all your editorial images to Alamy, Corbis and Zoonar, given that many other agencies take them as well? Thanks.

    • admin says:

      Hi Alessandra
      Good question! I know that some sites accept editorial shots, but at least one of them (Shutterstock) used to annoy me with their stupid requirement for a specific description of the shot. However, the main reason is that I wanted to get these on Alamy, because the occasional larger payouts are worthwhile and also Corbis also have strict rules about having to have model releases for people and property unless they are in the rights managed section. So although I don’t think their logic of linking RM with editorial is legally necessary, those are the rules they apply, and so any shot with a distant person without a release needs to be submitted as RM. They don’t allow the same shot to be RF on one site and RM with them, and so that means that if it is “editorial” in nature, it must go into the RM bucket and can’t be uploaded to the normal micro sites. Zoonar lets you specify if you have releases and also you get to choose the RM license with them as well. It is hard to say whether I would have got more with the 38c purchases of editorial shots with Shutterstock and the others – I think not, but it is hard to be confident!

      Steve

  3. Alessandra says:

    Alamy is complicated as far as key wording goes, (separating key words into groups of importance) and filling up all those windows.

  4. Alessandra says:

    Following up on this thread, I have become a contributor for Alamy, Zoonar and Corbis, but interestingly, Zoonar has rejected 95% of my editorial images, saying that they have “unwanted objects such as tree branches or random people”. Since they don’t have these elements and other agencies have accepted those photos, I am beginning to wonder if they really want editorial images. RF were all accepted. And how they know that the image is going to be RM is also a mystery, since we determine that after quality control. Just informing what is happening to me since it might be turn out to be the case for others also.

  5. admin says:

    Hi Alessandra

    It could well be that the editors at Zoonar don’t know you well enough and perhaps think that you don’t understand what is not acceptable commercially. I once had that happen to me and I wrote to their support team explaining that I had intended to mark those images as being RM with no model or property releases. I can’t recall if I had to submit them again (I think I had), but they were then accepted without any issues.

    Steve

  1. December 1, 2015

    […] I do, I seem to be stuck in a rut in terms of overall earnings. The images I uploaded last month (travel in Spain) were generally accepted, but sales of those particular images have been very slow to non-existent. […]

  2. October 19, 2016

    […] Next step is to finish the processing and think about keywording! See the next installment in Part 3 of Travel Photography. […]

I'm always interested in what you think - please let me know!